Performance of fiber optic cables can be determine by if the connector end faces are damaged or dirty. Just how perfect and clean is necessary for proper operation, you wonder?
Most assembly houses quickly get a feeling for where they want to operate but subjective defect and dirt appraisals can vary between operators and may tend to relax in times of high demand.
This is where automated end face inspection microscopes come in. Software analyzes the digital image for scratches, defects and dirt. The analysis is referenced to IEC standards and an objective report, independent of operator, time of day, or production pressure is produced and complete with images.
Sounds perfect, but are we being seduced by this digital wizardry? Is it really more accurate and consistent than a bunch of experienced operators? Also, will two instruments give the same result on any one end-face? This is of particular importance if your customer is also using an automated microscope for incoming inspection. Is it possible they could fail a connector that you shipped as good?
So, just how reproducible are these tools? FiberQA, manufacturer of the FastMT inspection scope, along with a discerning military contractor and a respected fiber optic cable manufacturer (details in link) set up a study to find out.
Our Tip is providing a link to this study: Measuring Fiber End Face Inspection Microscope Reproducibility using Chrome on Glass Artifacts
A well-defined test target was made using an etched chrome on glass technique. Five different targets, each emulating 33 fibers were fixed to MT ferrules, each “Fiber” having 16 defects, making, in total, 2640 unique particles.
The targets were measured 32 times for a total of 84,480 measurements. This set of measurement was made with three different FastMT instruments to ascertain the degree of consistency between them.
All the instruments showed a consistent defect size with a bias error for all measurement was within +- 0.1 um.
A full description of the experiment and the statistical methods used for crunching all this data can be found HERE.
- FOC Tips: automated end face inspection microscopes and where they come in - February 28, 2018
- Fiber Optic Center AskFOC: What documentation have you published on how operators can better meet design goals? - January 29, 2018
- Fiber Optic Center AskFOC: Chemical level changes in gas delivery system bubbling process - January 19, 2018
- Fiber Optic Center AskFOC: Specialty optical preforms strength and deposition issues - January 16, 2018
- Fiber Optic Center AskFOC: We are experiencing chemical level drops in our chemical bubbler. Is this a temperature issue or should we be focusing on other variables? - January 16, 2018
- Fiber Optic Center AskFOC: We are having issues with shrinkage and are focusing on the polish step. Looking for some steps, best practices, solutions, etc. - January 4, 2018
- FOC Marketing Tip 12: Social Media Navigation - December 22, 2017
- FOC Marketing Tip 11: Business Development: An Honest Conversation - December 21, 2017
- FOC Marketing Tip 10: Product Inventory Management and a quick snapshot…. - December 20, 2017
- FOC Marketing Tip 9: Trade Show Strategy Revisited - December 19, 2017